Do we learn more from work that follows or breaks with accepted Essay

Do we learn more from work that follows or breaks with judge hosts - Essay Example on that point has been plenty of research, since the inception of hu patch understanding of nature, on the methods of learning that are easy to follow as well as easy to teach. With the advancement in science and technology, there has been a lot of come about in every subject. As it follows from study, there are certain laws which govern every field of work. We hook on certain conditions which can only be true if the menti unrivalledd laws of governance are satisfied, these are the rules, methods or practices open by usage i.e. a custom. Similarly, a convention is a set of agreed, stipulated or generally recognized social norms, norms, standards or criteria, often taking the form of a custom.The simple meaning of the title of this canvas in simple terms is whether we learn more from having an advanced understanding of the subject made mathematical by following the results of an accepted convent ion (work that follows with accepted conventions) or we learn more from the failure of that convention which causes us to consider the results from a different perspective (work that breaks with accepted conventions). However, before deciding on matchless of the choices, we should acknowledge the fact that no matter if the work follows or breaks with accepted conventions, our level of understanding or thinking is elevated to a higher level. In my opinion, we can learn more from the work if it breaks with the accepted conventions. There are many reasons for choosing this case... However, if we do not get the results as determined by previous study and observations, we are forced to think of the peripheral (other minor variables included in the instructions) reasons that whitethorn lead to discrepancy of results. And as a result of this, we in simple words learn one way of not doing that experiment. And we can affirm this argument with a noteworthy quote from a famous inventor, Sir Thomas A. Edison I have not failed. Ive just found 10,000 ways that wont work.2Now taking an character from arts, we can affirm the belief that we learn more from the works that break following accepted conventions. The object lesson (more like a story) goes like this Sigmund Freud was a medical man. After completing his M.D. (Doctor of Medicine) from Vienna University, he started works with a doctor, as an associate director, who was handling cases of hysteria at that time. At that time young man and woman were suffering from hysteria in large numbers. The main reason of the hysteria was sex problem. The doctor, with whom Sigmund Freud was works as an associate doctor, used to rely on medicines (which were not very successful). Sigmund Freud thought it was necessary to go into depth. He suggested this to this senior doctor who disagreed. Thereafter, Sigmund Freud dissociated with him and opened his own clinic for hysteria patients. He started questioning and counseling the patien ts and fipple flute their interviews. And finally Sigmund Freud succeeded in finding out the reasons of Author 3hysteria. The reason was the emotional disturbance of the patients of some(prenominal) sexes. Freud then followed up the study with two books on that subject Dora and Wolf.1This example also points our attention